Design ‘by’ Data Imaginaries

Friends and colleagues will recall Prof Jon Oberlander who was at the heart of Design Informatics, University of Edinburgh from the very beginning. Jon passed away seven years ago in December 2017 and was a huge loss to a wide community both as a friend and an intellectual guide as we became more entangled with data-driven systems.

In 2016 together we co-authored the Ablative Framework for Designing FROM data (extractive), WITH data (co-design) and BY data (more-than-human). And the collaborative work with Elisa Giaccardi, Neil Rubens, Fionn Tynan-O’Mahony and Nazli Cila provided an early example of design BY data as the data traces of household objects provided insight into their relationships with humans (2016).

“Design by data: when systems are designed by other systems, largely autonomously, where new products and services can be synthesised via the data-intensive analysis of existing combinations of humans, computers, things, and contexts.” https://lnkd.in/g2s-gTSN

Now in RMIT the Data Imaginaries studio with Rusaila Bazlamit, in collaboration with Lucie Paterson Patterson and ACMI gave a chance to recover the ablative model when design BY data is enacted by Gen-AI.

Work from students featured in the images below was produced by students who worked with anonymised data from the ACMI lens system that allows visitors to the gallery to record their interest in exhibits across the Story of the Moving Image show.

You’ll see strong correspondence with Kate Crawford and Vladan Joler’s Anatomy of an AI System, as we asked design students to think about the provenance, integrity and performativity of the data more so than the pixel – hence the anatomy on the middle wall, and their data experiences on the side panels.

By sheer coincidence, Kate was in town for Mapping Planetary AI at the State Library Victoria and unpacked with further acumen the complexity of the social, mineral, energy and economic perils that face society as we tread the line between responsible and unjust use of AI. All credit to the Library for hosting the talk which allowed Kate to ask questions of the Library: What is the role of libraries after AI? Do they build their own LLMs? What might be the sustainable business models for a civic data-driven infrastructure?

Whilst the Anatomy work still attracts much attention, Calculating Empires https://lnkd.in/gnn7JStg is stunning evolution of the work “Calculating Empires is a large-scale research visualization exploring how technical and social structures co-evolved over five centuries. The aim is to view the contemporary period in a longer trajectory of ideas, devices, infrastructures, and systems of power.”

Thanks to Rusaila for the wonderful friendship and critical eyes, Lucie and ACMI for the data, and the design students for their openness to explore data over pixels. And of course to Jon O ❤️.

Comments are closed.

Related posts

What Doesn’t Need To Be New: Two Launches, One Week, One Paradox
What Doesn’t Need To Be New: Two Launches, One Week, One Paradox

Last week brought two events exploring regenerative futures from very different angles. On one after...


What does it mean for a university to be alive?
What does it mean for a university to be alive?

The RSA (The royal society for arts, manufactures and commerce), RMIT’s Regenerative Futures I...


Launching RFI…!
Launching RFI…!

Universities are extraordinarily good at adding things. Sustainability offices. Innovation hubs. Int...


Three provocations on designing futures worth watching / reflecting…
Three provocations on designing futures worth watching / reflecting…

Over recent weeks, we’ve been hosting talks from visitors who come through Melbourne. Always fun to...


What Would It Take to Read the Label?
What Would It Take to Read the Label?

February’s Futures Collider at RFI put three provocations in a room and asked people to act ou...


What Gets Counted When Institutions Choose Speed
What Gets Counted When Institutions Choose Speed

Two Sessions at FACT 2026 Reflections on qualitative knowledge, AI efficiency pressures, and what ge...


Two Rooms, Two Temporalities
Two Rooms, Two Temporalities

Two events at RMIT over the past couple of weeks revisited the temporal challenges at the heart of h...


Temporal Traps
Temporal Traps

Ending the year between collapse and care: three December gatherings on time, action, and giving bac...


Notes toward the 6th finger
Notes toward the 6th finger

I’ve spent 20 years watching designers optimise products that score well environmentally while...


Rep / Non-Rep & Foreclosure
Rep / Non-Rep & Foreclosure

Catching up with things, and the first of two posts this week, reflecting on events last week. Stayi...


“This communication is not for you.”
“This communication is not for you.”

Looking to connect 2 recent events / conversations (as is my want) this time to explore a fundamenta...


Design Frequencies: Sharing International Practice in Design Research
Design Frequencies: Sharing International Practice in Design Research

Already deep into semester two here. Last semester School of Design RMIT College of Design and Socia...


The Labour of the Rejected / “Walk the Plank”
The Labour of the Rejected / “Walk the Plank”

Still playing catchup with so many events. A few weeks ago during hashtag#DIS2025, Mafalda Gamboa an...


Design Contradictions
Design Contradictions

Two projects during Melbourne Design Week with collaborators Michael Dunbar and Liam Fennessy to exp...


Paradox of Collaborative Speed
Paradox of Collaborative Speed

Two events in Melbourne over the past 10 days week revealed a tension across contemporary technology...


Slow Materials, Slow Money: Can Design Decelerate?
Slow Materials, Slow Money: Can Design Decelerate?

Two events that I’m trying to tie together to glean some connections. The CHI panel on Regenerative...