Designing across and within ecosystems

Connecting 2 events, looking for correspondence seems is an emerging tactic in these posts, and two that proved fascinating in recent weeks was the Mapping Constellations for Regenerative Design conversation at DRS2024 Boston, & guest lecture by Danielle Wilde on Growing Collaborative Futures.

The DRS Conversation with Ann Light, Prof. Andrea Siodmok OBE FRSA , Sarah Teasley Laurene Vaughan, colin gray, Laura Forlano, Ph.D., Kristina Lindstrom and Dan Lockton, asked how might we use systemic constellation mapping to represent complex societal and multi-‘dream’ holder issues that describe social, climate and economic in/justices, to better understand how design can make a difference? The conversation addressed ‘transformative futures’ by adopting an expanded position to place the individual positionality of the designer into a constellation in which their opinions of the ways the world could or ought to, come into tension with other conditions and actors (human and more-than-human) through the forming of ‘systemic constellations’. Following the 2022 Conversation in Bilbao we used bodystorming methodologies to enquire into design research positions: https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers/drs2022/conversations/5/

While the 2022 DRS conversation focused on the reflexive perspective of the designer within complex systems, the 2024 conversation asked participants to consider a diffractive approach to their design research. We used Sarkar’s Ecosystem of Wicked Problems as a starting point, and asked participants to adopt one of the problems within the system.


In contrast / juxtaposition Danielle Wilde’s talk offered a practice through an ecosystem by transforming food systems and integrating traditional knowledge with ‘modern’ cultures. Perhaps a more reflexive approach, Danielle’s research ‘cut’ across food ecosystems to address climate change, biodiversity loss, and social inequalities. Emphasising the importance of small-scale, sustainable food production and consumption, and of leveraging traditional knowledge and practices to create a more just and sustainable food system. The talk also highlighted the need for interdisciplinary approaches that combine design, molecular biology, and agroecology to explore the multi-state metabolisms of odorants and to trace the flow of nutrients & pollutants across different scales.


By placing the two events together in one post, I guess I’m asking how design researchers hold on to different ‘frames’ simultaneously 1. the system and their place within it through a reflexive lens (Wilde), and 2. their impact / affect on a system through a diffractive lens (Constellation mapping). Not easy because the problem-solving positivism that design often inherits, belies both ways of doing.

The DRS paper from this year will pop up later in 2024…

Comments are closed.

Related posts

What Doesn’t Need To Be New: Two Launches, One Week, One Paradox
What Doesn’t Need To Be New: Two Launches, One Week, One Paradox

Last week brought two events exploring regenerative futures from very different angles. On one after...


What does it mean for a university to be alive?
What does it mean for a university to be alive?

The RSA (The royal society for arts, manufactures and commerce), RMIT’s Regenerative Futures I...


Launching RFI…!
Launching RFI…!

Universities are extraordinarily good at adding things. Sustainability offices. Innovation hubs. Int...


Three provocations on designing futures worth watching / reflecting…
Three provocations on designing futures worth watching / reflecting…

Over recent weeks, we’ve been hosting talks from visitors who come through Melbourne. Always fun to...


What Would It Take to Read the Label?
What Would It Take to Read the Label?

February’s Futures Collider at RFI put three provocations in a room and asked people to act ou...


What Gets Counted When Institutions Choose Speed
What Gets Counted When Institutions Choose Speed

Two Sessions at FACT 2026 Reflections on qualitative knowledge, AI efficiency pressures, and what ge...


Two Rooms, Two Temporalities
Two Rooms, Two Temporalities

Two events at RMIT over the past couple of weeks revisited the temporal challenges at the heart of h...


Temporal Traps
Temporal Traps

Ending the year between collapse and care: three December gatherings on time, action, and giving bac...


Notes toward the 6th finger
Notes toward the 6th finger

I’ve spent 20 years watching designers optimise products that score well environmentally while...


Rep / Non-Rep & Foreclosure
Rep / Non-Rep & Foreclosure

Catching up with things, and the first of two posts this week, reflecting on events last week. Stayi...


“This communication is not for you.”
“This communication is not for you.”

Looking to connect 2 recent events / conversations (as is my want) this time to explore a fundamenta...


Design Frequencies: Sharing International Practice in Design Research
Design Frequencies: Sharing International Practice in Design Research

Already deep into semester two here. Last semester School of Design RMIT College of Design and Socia...


The Labour of the Rejected / “Walk the Plank”
The Labour of the Rejected / “Walk the Plank”

Still playing catchup with so many events. A few weeks ago during hashtag#DIS2025, Mafalda Gamboa an...


Design Contradictions
Design Contradictions

Two projects during Melbourne Design Week with collaborators Michael Dunbar and Liam Fennessy to exp...


Paradox of Collaborative Speed
Paradox of Collaborative Speed

Two events in Melbourne over the past 10 days week revealed a tension across contemporary technology...


Slow Materials, Slow Money: Can Design Decelerate?
Slow Materials, Slow Money: Can Design Decelerate?

Two events that I’m trying to tie together to glean some connections. The CHI panel on Regenerative...